Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 22:37:31 -0400 From: "Radek" <radeknopsamr.ca> Subject: Re: 1994 Saab 900S - to buy or not to buy?
Thanks to all for your replies. BTW, you refer to this model as the "NG900". What's the "NG" stand for"? Thanks again. Radek. selkie9nopsamlessyahoo.com napisa„(a) w wiadomo¸ci: <3b0f7b42.3981374nopsam.latrobe.edu.au>... >Errm ...hi. >We've just signed the papers on a 94 Saab 900s, with the V6 in it. In >our ignorance (I really should have done this a few days ago), we >thought it looked and drove pretty well, and despite knowing that both >the engine and the transmission have recently been replaced, went >ahead, figuring that the two most expensive things had already busted >once, and so were less likely to come up too soon. Wrong idea? >How rotten are the V6's and what tends to happen? (Feel free to email >me if this isn't that interesting to other posters, I just wandered in >here tonight.) > >Selkie > >*My apologies if this post appears twice, I posted the damn thing >without a spamcatcher the first time* > >On 25 May 2001 21:22:15 -0700, sosbcnopsam.saabnet.com (Saabster) >wrote: > >>"Radek" <radeknopsamr.ca> wrote in message news:<dp_O6.188$rD3.45099nopsam.total.net>... >>> I will be looking at a 900S, year 1994.... Should this model >>> year be avoided altogether? >> >>Not necessarily. Just stay far, far away from the Opel-built V6s. As >>long as it's a turbo 4 you'll be fine. As with any car, test drive it >>and confirm its overall condition. Also try to determine its service >>history and whether or not its been properly maintained. The cool >>thing about the NG900s is that you can fit Viggen body parts on them >>to make them look sportier. >> >>Saabster >>85 900 8v >
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |