Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:06:29 GMT From: karenswnopsamhwest.net (Karen) Subject: Re: Mixed Saab Results...
In article <3BB0BB39.78C75C2Bnopsamdnet.att.net>, crodenopsamdnet.att.net says... > I've had three Saabs. The first was an 87 900. I actually bought it > for my wife, but it was so underpowered that a year later I traded it in > for an 88 900 Turbo. Now THAT was a great car. I put 100K on it in > eight years, and loved every minute of it. But thinking that 8 years > was long enough, I bought a 96 900SET. This car, I'm not so happy > with. The sheet metal is flimsy, the electronics fail occasionally, two > batteries have died, the ignition switch has died...it's just not that > reliable. So, now I've had this one 7. If I could somehow recapture > the experience (and confidence) of my 88, I'd buy another Saab in a > heartbeat. I have no desire to re-experience the 96. So, which of > these cars was the anomoly? Are the 9-3s better? > > Just looking for general comments, and what better place than the > internet? > I had an 85 900 Turbo that I was crazy about. I traded it in for a 96 900SE that I hated. Unwilling to give up on Saab, I traded that one for a 99 9-5 that I am very happy with. it's not an old 900 that I wish I had kept, but it's a fine car that I plan to keep for a long time. -- Karen karenswnopsamhwest.net
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |