Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:30:56 GMT From: "Davo" <whatevernopsamever.com> Subject: Re: Site going down.
<davehinznopsamcop.net> wrote in message news:am3a17$2bmj5$1nopsam34476.news.dfncis.de... > Someone who looks an awful lot like Davo <whatevernopsamever.com> wrote: > > > Colin, don't let Dave Hinz get under your skin. If there's even an iota of a > > point that can be picked on, he's in there boots and all dissecting every > > last piece. > > So, are you defending the publishing of private email then? No. Who said I was defending it? The particular occurrence in question has been debated in good spirit amongst the other posters. That one is up for debate. > > There are more posts from Dave engaging in fights with posters > > (not everyone is as *usenet* wise as Dave), than constructive contributions > > directly relating to SAABs. > > Yeah, I hardly ever try to help, or discuss the models I know about, or > engage in Saab discussions here. Riiiiight... Note the use of my word 'more'. > Let's see. I dislike spammers, people who try to cheat their way through > life, and people who go against usenet conventions (like, don't post a > binary to a text newsgroup). Which of these actions are you defending, > and on what grounds exactly? Your infer that I defend 'spamming' and 'those who cheat their way through life'? Retract please! CN was hardly spamming. http://spam.abuse.net/overview/whatisspam.shtml Usenet conventions aren't known by all. Politeness as I've seen from others resolve the issues fairly quickly. > > You will not be forgiven.. as I won't for this > > post... but hey, who gives a toss. > > Actually, I haven't noticed you much either way. But, I would like you to > explain which of the above types of people you're defending, so I at least > know why you disagree. As above > > You're providing a service out of your > > own good will and that's where it should be left. > > And I said twice, put it up, and if people like it, they'll use it. Maybe > you missed that (twice)? He broke the rules on someone else's forum, not > once but twice, by ignoring a warning that's right in front of one's > face when they're using the site. It's not rocket science... No, I didn't miss that twice. It's your ridiculously rude attitude here that turns others off. It's not rocket science....
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |