Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:31:11 +0000 From: Grunff <grunffnopsam.com> Subject: Re: GM 900 Vs. Classic 900
GG wrote: > Just to throw the cat among the pigeons..... > which is the better car the GM 900 or the classic 900, how different are > these two the GM version looks like a saab but is it really a saab? > At present it seems possible to buy a fairly decent version of either for > around £1500 in the UK, which is a better buy? Buy the GM 900 - leave all the classic 900s for me, because I love them and they are infinitely superior to GM 900s. Just to be clear - buy the GM 900. All C900s in the UK are destined for my yard. > I've got a 1990 900i and I have to say, I love it! Hoping to get a classic > T16s/aero soon how will that compare to my trusty 900i on speed, fuel > consumption and maintenance costs? My first suggestion is to sell both (maybe to me), and buy a GM 900. The T16 is superb, it's almost ideantical to your 900i, but lots more fun. Much faster (maybe 3 seconds or so off your 0-60 time). Fuel consumption will depend a lot on how much you take advantage of the increased capabilities ;-). Maintenance - they're virtually the same car, so no change there. You'll probably get through tires, pads and clutches quicker. -- Grunff
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |