Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 11:28:55 GMT From: meld_b <meld_bnopsamo.com> Subject: Re: How are 1994 900's?
Hmm... Yes a comparo would be interesting... Digging around in the stack of SAAB stuff I've got here shows: the NG weighs more and has 60/40 weight split instead of the old 61/39... The wishbones and the "really" equal halfshafts of the Classic I bet come into play too. Are you saying snow handling is a problem in the NG, or just: Don't expect the legendary handling of the C? I used to put snows on anyway. -D ma_twain wrote: > The Classics did not have electronic traction control - the layout of > the engine and transmission seem to result in better traction and > control in the snow. We need to do an objective test of a Classic verus > a NG Saab with the same tires in the snow. I drive Classics and I have > heard experienced Saab technicians repeat the reason above for the > better performance in the snow of the Classic. > > meld_b wrote: > >> >> I DO drive in snow, so you are saying it won't be as good as the C900? >> The weight distribution is still 60/40 right? Did traction control >> come on these? >> >> Thanks again, -D >> >> ma_twain wrote: >> >>> Two thoughts on first year of new model: >>> 1. There are design change issues >>> 2. These bugs were fixed by the previous owners in the 9 years since >>> 1994. >>> >>> Take it to a trusted Saab technician for a pre-purchase inspection >>> and get an objective assessment. >>> Snip The 'backwards' >>> engine layout of the Classic has been given credit for its handling >>> in the snow - which is not an issue if you don't drive in the snow. >>> The big, curved windshield of the Classic provide great visibility. >>> Drive the 1994 model and see if you notice the differences. Snip
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |