Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 07:20:57 GMT From: Paul Halliday <pjghnopsamyonder.co.uk> Subject: Re: Saab Complaint
in article 3f5bbe40$0$32488$edfadb0fnopsamd16.news.tele.dk, Henrik B. at saabnopsamdsl_nospam_.dk wrote on 08/09/2003 00:24: > Paul Halliday wrote: > :: Since GM took over Saab, it has been a long climb for Saab to return > :: to the same standards of safety they were revered for ten years ago. > :: Saab today makes a good car and a much better car than it did at the > :: launch of the 9-3 and 9-5 model ranges. Look at the EuroNCAP results > :: for Saabs a couple of years ago (such as the 2000 model) - that > :: tells a different story. > > What a load of rubbish Paul. :o) > Just recently, Swedish Folksam (insurance company), has named the Saab 9-5 > the safest car driving the Swedish streets! They investigated 76.000 > accidents in a period from 1996 - 2001 (or was it 2002). No other car is as > safe as the Saab 9-5 (1998-model). So Saab is building safer cars than ever. > Meaning that the Saab 9-5 from -98 up is as safe as anything else. I tend > not to put too much faith in EuroNCAP-results as it gives a stationary > picture. Whereas the Folksam statistic is "reallife". > > Here's a link, observe that the Saab 9-3 also is on top: > http://www.folksam.se/engelsk/howsafeisyourcar.htm I bow to your greater knowledge Henrik. So the truth is that Saab produced a car with an excellent safety standard from the start of the 9-3 and 9-5 series and it keeps on getting better. One of the tests that are carried out by EuroNCAP is the effect on the pedestrian should you hit one. While being safe yourself, not killing someone you run into is also a good thing. Cheers all, Paul
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |