Date: 6 Jul 2004 15:21:25 GMT From: Dave Hinz <DaveHinznospamcop.net> Subject: Re: test only
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:09:28 GMT, Bob <nonamenospamace.com> wrote: > On 6 Jul 2004 01:29:47 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinznospamcop.net> wrote: > >>Then he still failed. Why not post a real message, and treat >>it as a test if one doesn't want to use the groups set up for >>testing? > > OK... what if he was testing the groups response to *improper* > test messages. Then his post was the only way to go! er, yeah. > (hope you're laughing) Actually, it stopped being funny about a decade ago. I can't for the life of me imagine a logical thought process which says "Let's post a test message" which doesn't include "let's post a real message and see what happens".
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |