Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:54:58 +0100 From: MeatballTurbo <carl.robsonnospamcing-czechs.com> Subject: Re: I Test drove a 9-2x
In article <MPG.1b4f24d5dd060201989c96nospam.individual.de>, djtaylornospamoot.com says... > > 9000 CSE (an FPT 9000 driven normally rather than hooning should be more > > economical, but I can go for the Aero/Carlsson options because of the > > fuel issues). > > Not quite sure what you mean by that but I get the following fuel > consumption:- > > 9000 CD 2.0 lpt 31 imp. mpg > 9000 CS Aero 41 imp. mpg > > Both driven in a likewise manner on a motorway run. The Aero gearing is > so much higher. Meant to say can't go for an Aero/Carlson, but maybe I can can have an aero if I can stump up the cash. Would be nice. -- The poster formerly known as Skodapilot. http://www.bouncing-czechs.com