Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:54:07 GMT From: th <someguynospamwhere.se> Subject: Re: New tyres fitted to rear?
Fred W wrote: > Laura K wrote: >> "Al" <alistairdorenospamo.com> wrote in >> news:Ocexf.106311$D47.35437nospamnews.blueyonder.co.uk: >> >>> Just had two new tyres fitted to my 1987 900 Aero. >>> >>> Costco insisted that the new tyres were fitted to the rear not the >>> front, apparently they have been told by Michelin not to carry out >>> customers wishes and fit newer tyres to the front. They were playing a >>> "police" video which demonstrated the "problem" i.e. more grip on the >>> new front tyres leads to the car oversteer and skidding/spinning. >>> > > I have been told the same thing by tire professionals, that on a FWD car > you should put new tires on the rear. However, after a few thousand > miles you'll be rotating them anyway and those new(er) tires will then > be on the back, so... no big deal. > But why rotate them? Rotation is only to make the wear a bit more even, but it violates the rule about having the best tires on the rear. If you always stick with the most worn ones on the front you will need to buy tires twice as often but on the other hand the average age of the tires decrease, something valuable especially for winter tires. Maybe this rotation recommendation "is a subtle ruse by the tyre industry to make us change all our tyres at once" to quote the original post? -- th
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |