The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
7/1: Members: Log In to See Fewer Ads! |
5/28: SAAB Evolutions/TSN T-Shirts $14
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main 95 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: 9-5 2.3T vs Aero
Posted by Lou (more from Lou) on Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:58:05
In Reply to: 9-5 2.3T vs Aero, brian, Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:30:25
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
I believe the post by Brian prior to this is in some ways accurate, but in other ways a bit off the mark. The press releases about the 2002 cars infer that Aero like suspension specs have been adapted to the lesser versions, but perhaps driving one and seeing if all of the components have been used and work together is the better way. For example,they might have put in the struts and springs etc,but retained the prior Michelin "GREEN" tires used on 2.3 LPT models. If that is the case, it would take about $1500-1600 dollars to buy the better wheels and tires that are largely responsible for the Aero's better handling.
Another issue to consider is the fact that now the 2001 Aero can be bought for a significantly better price than what you will have to pay for a 2002 model.If value is what you are looking for, the 2001 will probably be the better deal. As nice as the 185 HP motor is, the Aero is far better on power and throttle response. Food for thought. Good luck on your decision.
Posts in this Thread:
- 9-5 2.3T vs Aero, brian, Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:30:25
- Re: 9-5 2.3T vs Aero, brian, Sat, 14 Jul 2001 16:41:00
- I'd get an '01 Aero..., Derek Gentry, Sat, 14 Jul 2001 10:19:00
- Re: 9-5 2.3T vs Aero, Rob Catron, Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:33:23
- Re: 9-5 2.3T vs Aero, Lou, Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:58:05 <-- Viewing This Message
- Re: 9-5 2.3T vs Aero, KeithCT, Fri, 13 Jul 2001 17:50:17
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
![](/tsn/xyz/stateofninebutton.gif) |
SaabClub.com
![](/tsn/xyz/scnabutton.gif) |
Jak Stoll Performance
![](/tsn/xyz/jakstollbutton.gif) |
M Car Covers
![](/tsn/xyz/mcarcoversbutton.gif) |
Ad Available
![](/tsn/xyz/buttonavailable.gif) |
![](/tsn/images/tsnmap.gif)
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!