1979-1993 & 94 Conv [Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
[Main C900 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: 2.1L intake - worth it? Posted by 900 Aero [Email] (#425) [Profile/Gallery] (more from 900 Aero) on Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:01:24 In Reply to: 2.1L intake - worth it?, RadioFlyer, Sat, 27 Oct 2012 20:17:28 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
Hi Sam, first off the ports are larger on the 2.1 intake than your 2.0 ports in the head are! Also the 2.1 throttle body doesn't have a nipple for the line that goes to your distributor's vacuum advance/retard unit plus the 2.1 throttle body won't accept your 2.0 throttle position switch! Even with both a 2.1 head and intake the power boost would only be at the very top end of your RPM range. As far as your rich idle I can email your Brad's trick or you could get a custom fuel chip for your ECU. Also my fully adjustable rising rate fuel pressure regulator will fix you rich idle problem as a RRFPR works in reverse (less fuel) when vacuum is present during idle conditions.
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.