The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
7/1: Members: Log In to See Fewer Ads! |
5/28: SAAB Evolutions/TSN T-Shirts $14
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main Vintage Models Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Not as good as today's, but better than most of its era
Posted by spiv (more from spiv) on Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:46:25
In Reply to: Saab 96 Safety, Saabnut009, Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:39:23
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
I agree with those who said modern cars definitely are safer, but the 96 was much better than most other similar-size cars of its day. Not only is the structure sturdy, and the interior designed with padded surfaces and non-gouging controls, but a lot of thought went into things such as fuel tank location and crush zones.
I've been sideswiped in a '70 96 -- was participating in a rally and got nailed by a Triumph TR4 that was doing nearly 70mph when he hit me. His car was totalled; I pried the front fender away from the tire on the 96 and drove it home.
I've also been rear-ended in a rustbucket '63 GT-850 (glad it had the deluxe seats with headrests!) What interested me about this accident was how the car behaved: the the fenders bowed out and the embossed sheet-metal panels aft of the wheel wells folded up gradually, dissipating the crash energy, but the rigid rear-axle tunnel structure stayed intact to protect the fuel tank (which is located between the rear wheels to isolate it in as many directions as possible.) In other words, it behaved exactly the way Keith Ayling said it would in the old '60s "Saab Guide" book. Mercedes claims to have invented "crumple zones" (they got the first patent, anyway) but looking at the structure of a 96 suggests that the Swedes were at least thinking along the same lines.
So if I were forced to be in a crash in a 1960s/70s compact car, a 96 would be my first choice! -- far and away over a VW Beetle or (gasp!) Renault, and probably over, say, a Volvo 122 because of fuel-tank location and other details. Of course, my REAL preference would be not to crash at all...
posted by 24.252.59...
Posts in this Thread:
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
|
SaabClub.com
|
Jak Stoll Performance
|
M Car Covers
|
Ad Available
|
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!