The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
7/1: Members: Log In to See Fewer Ads! |
5/28: SAAB Evolutions/TSN T-Shirts $14
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main NG900 & OG93 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
SAAB / GM mentioned in Wall Street Journal article
Posted by pursang (more from pursang) on Tue, 5 Mar 2002 12:17:10
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Catch the story in yesterday's Wall Street Journal (get it at the library) about how Volvo, Saab and Daimler are testing new models for safety protection in real world rollover accidents (ie, flipping the car at speed or dropping it on its roof from a certain height, or our favorite, hitting a moose), while GM, Ford and to a lesser extent Chrysler insist that a 30 year old test developed by the manufacturers, a static drop something on the roof at an angle test used by NHTSA, is still a sufficient test. Article had a nice picture of a rolled Explorer with a flattened roof.
One interesting defense by the US manufacturers seemed to be that the crushed roof doesn't kill people, they may have already suffered serious enough injuries to be dead in the moments leading up to the rollover. (Duh. Crushed roofs don't kill people, only dead, inattentive drivers cause crushed roofs?) Article points out that Volvo, Saab and Daimler test to make sure that the roof doesn't collapse and cause injury, Volvo using expensive boron steel alloys, and that they are also concerned that a rollover doesn't interfere with side impact and curtain style air bag systems.
The article also pointed out that it will be interesting to see how the internal conflict regarding testing standards resolves itself as the premium brands are absorbed into the larger volume manufacturers. Regression towards the mean, anyone? Keep watching.
posted by 208.212....
Posts in this Thread:
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
![](/tsn/xyz/stateofninebutton.gif) |
SaabClub.com
![](/tsn/xyz/scnabutton.gif) |
Jak Stoll Performance
![](/tsn/xyz/jakstollbutton.gif) |
M Car Covers
![](/tsn/xyz/mcarcoversbutton.gif) |
Ad Available
![](/tsn/xyz/buttonavailable.gif) |
![](/tsn/images/tsnmap.gif)
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!