1994-2002 [Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
[Main NG900 & OG93 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: another suggestion about the name Posted by Adam [Email] (#344) [Profile/Gallery] (more from Adam) on Sun, 29 May 2005 07:30:25 In Reply to: Re: another suggestion about the name, JimF, Fri, 27 May 2005 11:32:26 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
I do think the OG designation is a bit confusing. I logged in this morning and my first thought was "Where is the 9-3 bulletin board?" followed by "How could a 2002 be categorized as 'old'?" ...if we're going to use 'old' and 'new' as descriptors it seems that it would all be relative. What is/was new eventually has to become old so the designations would need to change so it would seem that in that scenario what we knew as the NG900 would then receive the OG designation and the 2002-era 9-3s would become NG9-3s followed by the current 9-3SS.
I personally think that could get really confusing so my vote is to leave the 900s/NG900s as they were - we all know what that means. I think designating the 9-3 (S, SE & Viggen) from the 9-3SS is all that is required perhaps with a MY indication in ( ) at the top level of each board to help folks along who may not know.
Just my $.02... OG seems to have too much "fossil" feel for me... just an opinion though. :-)
posted by 24.61.132...
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.