Click Banner for Details on this Saabnet.com Classified
The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
7/1: Members: Log In to See Fewer Ads! |
5/28: SAAB Evolutions/TSN T-Shirts $14
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main General Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Engine effciency (unfortunately longish)
Posted by xhawksaab (more from xhawksaab) on Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:31:40
In Reply to: Re: Turbocharger and engine effciency, steve, Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:26:14
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
The only instance that I can think of is in part-throttle situations, but then we are not talking same output. Efficiency is essentially energy output divided by energy input. It will be effected by: 1) the efficiency of the combustion process (which is effected by combustion chamber design, effective compression ratio, etc); 2) the frictional losses (generally less in a smaller engine); 3) mass of reciprocating and rotating components (again less in a smaller engine and may play more of a role in acceleration than steady state power). I think, that as long as you keep the requirement that the two engines are producing the same power and are discussing efficiency, the smaller turbo engine wins over the larger NA (naturally aspirated) engine. There are times when the larger NA engine may have certain advantages: small throttle openings where the larger NA engine will make more power and torque, less complication and potentially better throttle response. But IMHO, when you take into effect the entire package, a smaller lighter engine means you can use lighter suspension components, etc., which can make the car lighter. This will really move the efficiency argument in favor of the smaller turbo engine, all else being equal. My $0.02.
Posts in this Thread:
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
![](/tsn/xyz/stateofninebutton.gif) |
SaabClub.com
![](/tsn/xyz/scnabutton.gif) |
Jak Stoll Performance
![](/tsn/xyz/jakstollbutton.gif) |
M Car Covers
![](/tsn/xyz/mcarcoversbutton.gif) |
Ad Available
![](/tsn/xyz/buttonavailable.gif) |
![](/tsn/images/tsnmap.gif)
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!