[Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
 | [Main Performance Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: Expected cyl flow #'S? Posted by jak [Email]  (#195) [Profile/Gallery]
(more from jak) on Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:44:44
In Reply to: Expected cyl flow #'S?, ZX_80R, Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:56:32 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
I would back cut & blend the intake valves (I did the intake & exhaust in my SPG)
some dont want to back cut exhaust valves on turbo cars because removing mass can cause them to get hotter & cause pre ignition so if you do the exhausts take it easy on the removal of material
get the port roof as high as you can, do pocket work & pocket to port blending
I wouldent bother with the short side too much? although you do have a bench :-)
I would advise you get a 2.1 NA head or an erly 2.3 head
do you notice how one intake port is lower then the other?
these heads are terrible in my opinion
Ive never has them on a flow bench
I tend to go for the line of sight method trying to make more of the valve seats visable thru the port or visa versa :-)
take care & good luck
JAK
, Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:44:44 <-- Viewing This Message
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
