Re: Jamex vs. Intrax vs. others..........(springs question) - Saab Performance Bulletin Board - Saabnet.com
The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
7/1: Members: Log In to See Fewer Ads! |
5/28: SAAB Evolutions/TSN T-Shirts $14
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main Performance Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: Jamex vs. Intrax vs. others..........(springs question)
Posted by Ubipa (more from Ubipa) on Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:21:45
In Reply to: Re: Jamex vs. Intrax vs. others..........(springs question), Gordon [Profile/Gallery]
, Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:13:33
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
you can only go so low on a c900, the front wheel wells and suspension configuration will not allow it. Even w/ stiffer springs, If you go so low you'll end up w/ only about an 1" of travel which doesn't leave much for handling nor comfort.
Personally I feel the Jamex aren't worth the penny, way too soft for how low they go.
If you want to go low, you'll have to go stiffer for sure but I wouldn't go lower than the Intrax height (10.5" free height w/ >400lb/in spring). Intrax or OMP. I haven't seen any pics but what Brad is offering sounds like it would surely work w/ the springrates he states. Pretty nice if you're looking for a track setup too.
posted by 66.54.17...
Posts in this Thread:
- Jamex vs. Intrax vs. others..........(springs question), SPGuy, Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:17:18
- Re: Jamex vs. Intrax vs. others..........(springs question), Ubipa, Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:39:57
- Re: Jamex vs. Intrax vs. others..........(springs question), GM, Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:39:35
- Re: Jamex vs. Intrax vs. others..........(springs question), Gordon , Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:13:33
- Re: Jamex vs. Intrax vs. others..........(springs question), Ubipa, Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:21:45 <-- Viewing This Message
- Re: Jamex vs. Intrax vs. others..........(springs question), GM, Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:42:17
- You should ask Brad what his lowest drop is., Dave D, Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:23:04
- Height, Brad, Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:12:09
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
|
SaabClub.com
|
Jak Stoll Performance
|
M Car Covers
|
Ad Available
|
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!