[Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
![]() | [Main Performance Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: Drivetrain loses revisited, 900 vs 9000 Posted by Kevin K [Email] ![]() ![]() In Reply to: Drivetrain loses revisited, 900 vs 9000, Ryan B, Tue, 3 Dec 2002 00:35:05 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
regarding 3rd or 4th gear dyno runs and/or acceleration:
900 is less efficent because it has:
- chain and sprockets
- 2 gear meshes (to and fro layshaft), vs 1 mesh for 9k
- 90 deg bevel final gears, vs helical for 9k.
Based on many diff dyno sheets for various stock FD rx7's I have seen, usually 3rd gear, rwhp was typically 222 +/-2 vs 255 at eng, for 13% loss. This has bevel final gears and 2 meshes in 3rd (1 in 4th).
for the 900, add couple percent for chain, gets u mabe 15% losses ( wheel hp x 1.18 = eng hp, at 15% loss).
for 9k tranverse design, no bevel and 1 less mesh, mabe 10% losses, (1.11 multiplier).
These loss values, 15%, 13%, and 10%, are based on near stock hp. Part of these losses are load dependent and some aren't. If you are at 2x stock hp, mabe knock 15% off these corrections.
The recently posted values of ~20% for the 9k were based only on non-load dependent effects like tire friction, from coast down tests, meaning predicted total losses would be even higher. These are very high %'s, and many, many shops do not use coast down values. I do recall one test where an engine dyno was also used, and coast down values were too high, and actual losses were consistent with my loss values.
figure 20-25% losses for awds.
posted by 67.201.228...
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |