[Main Performance Bulletin Board | BBFAQ | Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ] Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos there are 2 chips which are on the website Like This Post: - Subscribe to Daily Digest for this Bulletin Board Posted by jak [Email] (#195) [Profile/Gallery] (more from jak) on Sun, 5 Jun 2005 06:47:17 In Reply to: Re: depends on your goals, BevanD, Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:38:25 Alert me when someone posts in this thread: Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup

1 uses the 280 150 945 FMS which is 28 lb hr at 2.7bar & #30 on hte nose at 3.0bar
I now have 2 chips for the 280 150 431? red top trionic injector
one with stock rev limit which I seemed to get realy good closed loop part throttle & idle controll & the other with a higher than stock rev limit about 6700RPM made for a big turbo & IC & everything which has great WOT fueling but at the time I did it seemed to be just a hare rough on the idle which later I figured may have been the car I was using & not a limitation of the batchfire as I initially thought
Ive been thinking about working with the 009 injector which I think is a pre trionic DIAPC 2.42LH & are about 33 lb hr at 3barfp but havent gotten around to it as the SPG is down at the moment
I can do rough gestimates at other stuff like the 009 which will get you in the ballpark though
take care
JAK

• What am I looking for #24 injectors for C900T??, largelylivin, Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:25:17
  • 24 lb hr will suport 3.5HP per cylinder more than stock, jak , Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:05:11
    • Im sory that was a typo I meant 23 lb hr at 3bar, jak , Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:22:33
      • Re: Im sory that was a typo I meant 23 lb hr at 3bar, BevanD, Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:40:28
        • sure FMS would be a decent choice especially...., jak , Sun, 5 Jun 2005 06:36:30
        • that's what I thought too..., JJ, Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:03:44
    • Re: 24 lb hr will suport 3.5HP per cylinder more than s, KeithG, Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:07:19
    • Re: 24 lb hr will suport 3.5HP per cylinder more than stock, BevanD, Thu, 2 Jun 2005 03:40:30
      • depends on your goals, jak , Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:26:40
        • Re: depends on your goals, BevanD, Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:38:25
          • there are 2 chips which are on the website, jak , Sun, 5 Jun 2005 06:47:17 <-- Viewing This Message
    • Are you sure about the stock injectors Jak?, Tushy, Wed, 1 Jun 2005 19:19:09
      • NAs are 19 lb hr at 3bar turbos are 21 lb hr at 2.5bar, jak , Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:28:47
    • THanks JAK. And, How did you calculate that? NM, largelylivin, Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:08:57
      • http://users.erols.com/srweiss/tableifc.htm nm, jak , Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:11:33
        • oops, jak , Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:12:18
          • Wow! Thanks. NM, largelylivin, Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:27:56

No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.

• Prev by Date: sure FMS would be a decent choice especially...., jak, Sun, 5 Jun 2005 06:36:30
• Next by Date: Re: Turbochrage a 280k motor/tranny?, Chadwick, Sun, 5 Jun 2005 07:22:07
• Main Performance Bulletin Board

StateOfNine.com

SaabClub.com

Jak Stoll Performance

M Car Covers

Ad Available

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2024 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Mission & Privacy Notice.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]

Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)