Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 18:46:37 GMT From: iannopsame.demon.co.uk (Heavy) Subject: Re: 900 Turbo Coupe vs Prelude SH
On Fri, 26 Dec 1997 13:59:20 -0500, Bill K <billknopsamrsey.com> wrote: > >--------------E43186B2092B26A9204871EC >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Guys, >I'm considering a 900 Turbo cpe over another Prelude. To affirm this I'd >like to hear some Saab (Sob?) stories concerning the newer 900 turbos. >Quirks aside, is it any better than a Honda in heavy rains or snow? >How does the build quality hold up after the warranty fades? >It's winter here in NJ so I can't tell how well the A/C works, anyone >use it hard in 100+ degree conditions? > >Let's hear it... >Thanks for your comments, >Bill Knopsamrsey.com I'd stick with a Honda. In my opinion, the new post GM Saabs have got to be dodgy relations to the Vauxhall/Opel cars that are sold over here. If you were considering a pre-GM car I'd say Saab. Nothing touches a Saab in the snow, but nothing touches Honda's reliability. Put some snow tyres on your new Honda and you'll be okay.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
