Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 12:04:16 -0800 From: RED <davharnopsamnet.net> Subject: Re: 1991 Grand Am For Sale
Baur323 wrote: > > >2. Several studies have shown the safety aspect of driving with day-lights > >on. People can see you bother (indeed in your eye-corner you allways see > >lights showing up). > > > > Several studies have also shown the safety aspect of when other drivers pull > their heads out of their asses. > > Have you noticed that these people driving POSes, like Pontiacs, leave their > DRLs on at night? I will agree with the added safety feature of DRLs during > the day, but highbeam DRLs at night? These people need a clue. > > To make this applicable to the Saab NG, I like the feature of being able to > shut the car down, leaving the headlights in the 'ON' position, and the marker > and headlamps turn off. Effectively having switchable DRLs. > > -ray People who oppose DRL's must all live in sunny climates. Here in central Ohio many people won't turn on one goddam light until it is absolutely pitch dark. And then, they turn on their puny parking lights. It is also cloudy and gray around here much of the time. Has anyone noticed that a majority of cars are road-colored or sky-colored (as opposed to, say, yellow or red) these days? It's a real adventure to drive on a rainy or snowy day on the same road with these people who won't turn lights on no matter what. I'd like to know what they're thinking (or IF they're thinking). I think it would be fascinating if police set up a roadblock on a gray, misty, rainy day and just listen to the reasons people give for not turning their lights on. I usually oppose any form of unnecessary government coercion, but if people are terminally stupid, what are you going to do? SAAB driver.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
