Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:40:41 +0000 From: Johannes H Andersen <johsnopsamanytime.co.uk> Subject: Re: Why SAAB 93 !
Bob wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:42:26 GMT, hohnopsamlid.invalid (Goran Larsson) > wrote: > > >In article <3C78D996.683F2032nopsamanytime.co.uk>, > >Johannes H Andersen <johsnopsamanytime.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> I've seen many. If you look at the boot on a 9-3 convertible, it says 93! > > > >No it does not. It says 9„ (nine raised to three). The Saab 93 is a > >different car. > > Yes, well... much as I like Saabs, they were utter idiots to name > the 9-3 what they did after having a 93. In fact, they were pretty > stupid to come out with a 9-3 and a 9-5 in the 1990's. In fact, > these "names" rank among the worst in auto-dom. I don't think a mathematician would accept Goran's explanation (nine raised to three), the 'three' is just too large. It does look more like a hastely written 93 on the boot, I bet if you asked hundred people what that car is, most would say it is a Saab 93. The logical conclusion is that it is an updated version of the last 1960 model. Johannes
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
