Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 19:54:15 GMT From: "James Eckles" <dcjayhawknopsamhlink.net> Subject: I'm with you Bob.
I got banned for posting something that was harmless as well. It's no big deal since I can still post there, I just have to do it from home or from a proxy at work and change my moniker frequently. He's indeed too dictatorial. Kent "Bob" <uctraingNOSPAMnopsamanet.com> wrote in message news:ulo2ou0mt1o559d73jj1e56renfol1e32gnopsamcom... > On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 01:18:59 GMT, cn <nonenopsam.com> wrote: > > >My original intention was honest. I felt a need and I knew a way to > >fulfill it. Obviously I went about it the wrong way. Im not sure what > >outcome you were looking for from the thread, but I have decided to take > >the site down. > > > The guy who runs the saab network is a little odd at times. I won't > bother reposting the whole long tale, but I got banned too. All I > did was post something that the owner didn't like. It wasn't false, > it wasn't abusive, it wasn't off color, it wasn't on the list of > "don't post this here" - he just didn't like what I pointed out about > the site. > > I'd been a helpful and religious poster for a long time at that point. > He banned my IP without even an email note or warning, then deleted > *all* my posts from the past years. I know other folks who've been > banned for ridiculous reasons too. The owner is a very unusual fellow > and he's very dictatorial about "his" site. I have other ways to post > too but I wouldn't consider contributing content to that site ever > again. > > Bob >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
