Date: 26 Mar 2003 17:40:02 GMT From: davehinznopsamcop.net Subject: Re: What to call the "new" 9-3 ?
Someone who looks an awful lot like 'nuther Bob <noemailnopsammain.com> wrote: > Seems OK at first, but then we have: > 900/OG900-->900/NG900-->9~3(equiv NG900)-->NG-9~3 > So, if someone posts "How hard is it to change the struts in a 9-3", > I'd have to say "an NG900 9-3" or an "NG 9-3" ? Naah, they'll either give a year making it unnecessary, or they'll ask about changing the struts in a "93" and I can post a confused-sounding post about how the Saab 93 (1956-1960) uses shocks, not struts, post a link to a picture or two, and ask for clarification. > Maybe it works if we start calling the 9~3 the OG9-3 and the > new 9~3 the NG9~3 ? SO now it's: I'm thinking that whatever we decide on as a group today won't be known by anyone else coming in anyway, so it's not all that important anyway. Dave