Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:09:31 +0800 From: "Starman" <mail.spamnospamt.net.au> Subject: Re: Saab Quick?
"The Malt Hound" 1ZedncKYJfcsOUPcRVn-vQnospamphia.com... > > "Starman" <mail.spamnospamt.net.au> wrote in message > news:41de5b70$0$5657$5a62ac22nospamqv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... >>>> > >>>> Ok just timed it from 0-60kmh = 5.06secs and 50-70kmh 3.15secs. >>>> >>>> Does this sound about right? This was really pushing it too and with >>>> no >>>> wheel spin. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Starman from Oz >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I don't know, 0-60 in Kms is not a standard measurement, it's 0-60 mph, >>> or >>> 0-100 kmm. >>> >>> >> >> I retested it from 0-100kmh = 9.78secs. I got slight wheel spin in >> first, so I could have maybe got it down to 9.5 or so. Anyone else done >> this test and if so how does it compare? (Don't know if I mentioned it >> before bt my car is a 5 speed manual). >> >> Regards >> Starman from Oz >> > > http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jan2001/980259557.Ph.r.html > > MaltHound Thanks for that Malt Hound - I knew all that algebra at school would come in handy one day! I was hoping for a slightly less scientific response though. Anyone actually timed out their 9-5 5peed manual? Any range will do, in KMH or MPH so that I can compare. Regards Starman from Oz > >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
