Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 01:51:12 GMT From: James Sweet <jamessweetnospamail.com> Subject: Re: V6 9-5 - is it worth the risk?
Bill Jackson wrote: > I've read a lot about this in the past few years here, seems that there is a > good bit of apprehension abut the 3.0l V6 in a 9-5. I have to say that I > never really paid a whole lot of attention. Turns out that the back posts > aren't archived on my news server so I can't go look them up. > > > I am looking to replace my '99 SE 4-cyl and came across a very nice looking > 2003 with a 6-cyl. > > What's the downside? > > Poor fuel economy, difficult maintenance, less power than the 4 cyl turbo, lower resale value, etc.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
