[Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
 | [Main Performance Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: I've had excellent results with the Trent on my own car Posted by Kevin K [Email]  (#374) [Profile/Gallery]
(more from Kevin K) on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:17:20
In Reply to: I've had excellent results with the Trent on my own car, WASSAAB, Wed, 20 Mar 2002 10:56:12 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
seems u'd be richer with trent vs 3.0, if zero'ed at 3.3 bar as u noted before. With trent, only leaner at very light loads (vac) or idle, and much richer at high boost, if 3.3 base setting. the signal bleed I mentioned before would avoid over-rich mid range Dr Boost predected and others have found.
I've seen measured curves that show trent is 1.7 up to 15 psi, and about 1.6 at 20 psi, vs zero boost start point. I looked at malpassi for my rx7 a few years ago, and malpassi of italy advertized the rate at 1.4, but I believe the measure curved instead, that is consistent with Trent e-mail that onfirmed 1.7 rate.
Spg9 site has their measured curves. It shows 1.8 rate up to 15 psi, and and 1.9 rate at 20 psi, vs zero boost reference. They advertise 1.7 rate.
Chad B has it right, where 220 whp needs another path to proper fueling.
posted by 67.208.188...
, Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:17:20 <-- Viewing This Message
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
