2003-2011 [Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
[Main 93 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: Have you driven other 9-3SS's (or CV or SC)? Posted by vvack0matic [Email] (#1443) [Profile/Gallery] (more from vvack0matic) on Mon, 21 Oct 2013 06:56:25 In Reply to: Have you driven other 9-3SS's (or CV or SC)?, AeroEd, Sun, 20 Oct 2013 17:36:27 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
Yes I own the 01 9-5 aero and the 2010 9-3 aero, the 9-3 turned into a lawn ornament being I perferr driving the 9-5. The 9-3 was to replace my 9-5 thats becoming plauged with problems. Although the 9-5 is a 2.3 which makes it faster off the light and the stock aero suspension in the 9-5 is rock hard. I thought the 9-3 aero would have the same handling in the suspension so I bought the car and the first test drive I did with it was driving it home. First hard corner at high speeds reminds me of driving a station wagon round a corner. I haven't been in the later year 9-5 all i can tell tour is the 01 is super solid the seats in it might also contribute to its
ride, And yes the comparison is between the 9-5 aero and the 9-3 aero, I would have thought the 9-3 would have had a stiffer ride being its a lighter car and its 2.0 motor in comparison to the c-900 88spg 2.0 is very lacking in the up take.
Had I knowen the 2010 9-3 aero was what it is I'd use the money to purchase a 9-5 aero instead. But I'm looking for the rough solid ride and not having to have to modify the car to get it. The ride of the 9-3 might be exactly what your looking for, its 2.0 is a motor and will get the car down the road.
posted by 70.192.223...
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.