[Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
[Main Performance Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: so which is better??? Posted by Kevin K [Email] (#374) [Profile/Gallery] (more from Kevin K) on Sun, 8 Dec 2002 20:42:05 In Reply to: so which is better???, GM, Sat, 7 Dec 2002 19:23:21 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
3 friction sources, 2 radial loads at 2 bearings, and 1 thrust load. turbonetics will have 50% to 70% of the GT series drag reduction, by taking 1 radial and 1 thrust load with the ceramic ball bearing.
turbonetics in theory is a best bang for $, but I have no info on reliability. The GT series has a very good record.
Note oil flow must be greatly restricted to any ball bearing ... supplier should know.
ckpaden: there seemed to be some confusion here ... garrett does not use ceramic bearings in their GT series.
Waht about a GT25
Posted by ckpaden (more from ckpaden) on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:29:51
In Reply to: Feedback on Forced P. and turbochargers.com, JFF, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:12:03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a series of turbo's from garrett that range in compressor size. The advantage of a system like this is that it will allow you to upgrade your turbo and have an twin ceramic ballbearing which will greatly reducing the turbo lag.
posted by 67.208.17...
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.