Purpose of freewheel for Saab trans - Saab Sonett Bulletin Board - Saabnet.com
The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main Sonett Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Purpose of freewheel for Saab trans
Posted by Jason [Email] (more from Jason) on Fri, 22 Sep 2000 14:34:59
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
I'm looking at this Sonett III and am wondering what the purpose of the freewheel was originally.
It really seems to be the same functionally as putting the car in neutral while driving, although you have to be stopped to engage it, so it makes no sense to use this while driving. The vehicle also has a nice bar across the front, suitable for a tow bar. And the whole car weighs 1960 lbs.
Was this vehicle originally meant to be a light, high MPG commuter car, rather than a sports car which it more closely resembles? The freewheel seems ideal if you wanted to tow the car behind an RV, as do the tow bar connection and the overall light weight. The car also has a very aerodynamic shape, which was apparently intentional (the mirrors are bullets, for example, to reduce drag, and the headlights are hidden.)
I'm thinking about the Pontiac Fiero, which was originally (in concept) supposed to be a lightweight, cheap, high MPG commuter car. Once the head of Pontiac saw the concept he thought lightweight, cheap sports car. The car ended up somewhere between b/c of this difference in opinion.
There are several idealogical similairities between these two cars: materials, construction, platform design (Saab used the 9X series, GM used the Pontiac 6000 and Chevette), and power output (read small). The biggest difference is fuel tank and engine placement.
Any thoughts as to the original purpose of this car, and thus the problematic freewheel? Do any of the other Saab 9X cars have this feature?
Posts in this Thread:
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
|
SaabClub.com
|
Jak Stoll Performance
|
M Car Covers
|
Ad Available
|
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!