The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
7/1: Members: Log In to See Fewer Ads! |
5/28: SAAB Evolutions/TSN T-Shirts $14
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main 95 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
I cant believe how the trashed this car!
Posted by Eseir (more from Eseir) on Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:10:20
In Reply to: Edmunds Aero Road Test, MPY, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:53:57
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
I do not drive an Aero, I actually drive the LInear and I am very happy with it. I happen to think that the car is beautiful, unique, fun, and extremely confortable. As I was making my decision to buy my car, I test drove a bunch of different cars such as the TL, Maxima, CTS, Lincoln LS, etc. All these cars had some positives and some negatives. Granted, I was a little concern about spending this kind of money for a four cylinder with flimpsy cup holders and with very little store room. But, the positives completely outweighted these factors by FAR. I looked at a 300M, but PLEASEEEEEE! Talking about Realibility and quality of workmanship! Who are they kidding! The Acura is a great car, but it is cramped, amall, it is an Accord, and everybody drives one. $40,000 for a A4-no way! Too much money for what it is. A Passat W8? Who are they kidding?Earlier this week, Edmunds reviewed four sports roadsters with the MErcedes taking the number one spot. Is it fair to say that the Porsche is not a good car because it does not have half of the gadgets that the other cars have? Or it is not as confortable as the LExus? or their engines are noiser, loud, and old school. These people are Edmunds are full of it....
posted by 12.164.4...
Posts in this Thread:
- Edmunds Aero Road Test, MPY, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:53:57
- Re: Edmunds Aero Road Test, Donn, Sat, 15 Jun 2002 16:50:31
- Factual Inaccuracy - Did they really drive this car?, Simon Watkins, Sat, 15 Jun 2002 09:55:11
- I added a post to Edmunds board, Jacques Racine, Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:52:37
- Re: Edmunds Aero Road Test - My comments to them (long), Simon Watkins, Sat, 15 Jun 2002 06:12:44
- Checkout their editors' backgrounds, Gary, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:13:06
- Too bad Karl didn't review it..., MPY, Sat, 15 Jun 2002 00:33:43
- UNBELIEVABLE!!!, MPY, Sat, 15 Jun 2002 00:26:31
- OMG!! That's too funny.... nm, AdamB
, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:08:03 - Oops! Here's link, Gary, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:15:12
- I usually think most reviews are pretty impartial . . ., Mike D, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:25:41
- Re: My Flaming Email to Edmunds, Roberto Lombardi, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 16:12:52
- 300M is junk, noisey, coarse, poor quality.., Mike Lynch
, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:49:47- More or less agree, Mike D, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:27:23
- Re: More or less agree, Chris Kmiec, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 20:50:11
- Well, I HAVE driven a 300M..., Jay, Sat, 15 Jun 2002 05:09:06
- I agree., Mike D, Sat, 15 Jun 2002 22:40:31
- Ummm . . ., Mike D, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 23:12:52
- Inflammatory too, this is the Saab site, right? nm, Mike Lynch
, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 22:09:29
- I can't believe they compared it to a Maxima, Jay, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:24:15
- why read edmunds?, RickP, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:07:22
- Chrysler better ???, Coolknight, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:05:00
- Loss of credibility for Edmunds, Sieglo, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:06:28
- Nitpickings, KS, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:44:33
- The only thing good about Edmunds...., Bob M, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:27:33
- Malicious misinformation..., bRAD, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:11:22
- Edmunds Road Tests in general, compaqted, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:15:45
- At least they didn't call it 'quirky'... n/m, M. Bonkalski, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:13:55
- I cant believe how the trashed this car!, Eseir, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:10:20 <-- Viewing This Message
- That's probably the most idiotic review I've read yet.., AdamB
, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:25:17 - Re: Edmunds Aero Road Test, roberto, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 05:37:24
- Well, at least they loved the stereo, Yury, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 05:23:17
- Notice the bit about belt hight adjustment, Yury, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 05:20:07
- Re: Edmunds Aero Road Test, mlc
, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 01:49:45 - Edmunds activity, Scott Paterson
, Fri, 14 Jun 2002 01:20:02
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
![](/tsn/xyz/stateofninebutton.gif) |
SaabClub.com
![](/tsn/xyz/scnabutton.gif) |
Jak Stoll Performance
![](/tsn/xyz/jakstollbutton.gif) |
M Car Covers
![](/tsn/xyz/mcarcoversbutton.gif) |
Ad Available
![](/tsn/xyz/buttonavailable.gif) |
![](/tsn/images/tsnmap.gif)
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!