The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
7/1: Members: Log In to See Fewer Ads! |
5/28: SAAB Evolutions/TSN T-Shirts $14
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main C900 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: Later years did have more horsepower, but if those body...
Posted by Dishwalla (more from Dishwalla) on Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:36:05
In Reply to: Re: Are SPG's Slower than A Normal 900T? I Think So., Jack T., Mon, 20 Aug 2001 23:01:08
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
panels weight 80 pounds I'll eat my hat.
In defense however, let's be a little realistic here; obviously an Aero is going to smoke an SPG. If an Aero can hold it's own to a Mustang or Corvette, an SPG can't even be remotely compared to an Aero. It's like playing Rugby with a ten-year-old. His original question/comparison of the 900T vs. the SPG was well voiced. What if someone wrote instead of a comparison of an Aero vs. a 92' 9kt (which even very slightly modified WILL smoke an Aero, ask anyone on 9k BB) and someone mentioned that a Porcshe 944 Turbo could take both of them? Wow, could it REALLY?
I agree whole-heartedly with the comment on the SPG looking better, but the SPG I feel was more rated on its suspension than for extra power. As for the wheels weighing extra, that's a very good subject. That is very interesting if they weight that much more. It's too bad that vanity has to have such a downside on this car, but given the proper modifications it will scream like there's no tomorrow.
posted by 198.115.16...
Posts in this Thread:
- Are SPG's Slower than A Normal 900T? I Think So., The Red Baron, Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:57:19
- Mine's always seemed to be a quick enough car 316hp @6500rpm n/m, Mike K., Tue, 21 Aug 2001 21:32:59
- No question for '86 models..., IrieTom
, Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:23:08 - As an 85 Aero driver I'd have to agree, Jo K, Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:45:50
- Re: Are SPG's Slower than A Normal 900T? I Think So., GM, Mon, 20 Aug 2001 23:25:20
- Re: Are SPG's Slower than A Normal 900T? I Think So., Jack T., Mon, 20 Aug 2001 23:01:08
- Faster in auto-x competition, Kevin K , Mon, 20 Aug 2001 21:49:06
- True, The Red Baron, Mon, 20 Aug 2001 22:00:07
- Re: Are SPG's Slower than A Normal 900T? I Think So., Randy Thatcher
, Mon, 20 Aug 2001 21:21:30
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
 |
SaabClub.com
 |
Jak Stoll Performance
 |
M Car Covers
 |
Ad Available
 |
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!