In Reply to: V6 or four for 300hp?......., Mike Lynch [Profile/Gallery] , Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:02:40

why not expand the engine pallette. We are close to maxing out reliable horsepower on the 4 cyl. (Spare the 1000hp 4cyl race engine comments, the key is RELIABLE horsepower.) If we want to keep rising in HP with the rest of the competitors, we need a powerplant that can be stretched into the 400hp range without compromising ease of ownership. With a V6, 400-450 horsepower is completely viable, and easy to obtain without harsh high output turbos or the need for high octane fuel, etc. Remember, we can get all of the horsepower in the world out of our 2.3 litre powerplant, but not on pump fuel. Already with some of the aftermarket ECM upgrades, you run the risk of hurting an engine if the correct octane isn't used (especially at higher altitudes).

There will always be a 4 cyl available, but for the 'gusto' models, we need more. The fashioning of aluminum has come a long way and with today's technology, an ultra-lightweight 6 cylinder engine block is an easy task. Remember the article on the all-aluminum V8 that was being tested in the 9-5? It's weight was comparable to our existing 4 cylinder.

Cheers,
Brian.

posted by 65.106.25...

• Spoke with a salesman RE: 9-3AERO!!!, matt 94 aero, Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:27:01
  • V6 or four for 300hp?......., Mike Lynch , Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:02:40
    • Yes, but...., b.flippo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:19:11 <-- Viewing This Message
  • This matches what I was told at Flight Academy, jc, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 14:06:18
  • 2005 9-3 Aero 4wd and 280bhp V6 n/m, Paul , Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:26:19
  • There's been no concrete confirmation, but..., b.flippo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:38:15
    • Re: There's been no concrete confirmation, but..., CFishgo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:21:06
      • The Puch info was not formal but ---, Ian Glenday , Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:09:36
        • Okay, I knew that I hadn't lost my mind..., b.flippo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:23:04
          • I think the confusion regarding Puch came from the, Price, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:51:44
            • could of been wrong about the Puch (name), CFishgo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:12:27
      • What did we showcase at SEMA..., b.flippo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 14:34:07
        • You are completely off-base here! Saab PR does, Price, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:12:35
          • Price...., b.flippo, Fri, 6 Dec 2002 11:14:01
            • Good, let's discuss it offline. n/m, Price, Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:05:29
          • I agree - Saab got a lot of attention and write ups..., Scott Paterson , Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:42:13
          • Incredible marketing job for only 3 people! (nm), CFishgo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:58:08
      • Concept Car = $$$, FrozenSaab, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 14:12:54
        • The 900 SVO was the show car for the Viggen., Price, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:19:32
        • Re: Concept Car = $$$ (long), CFishgo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:09:38
          • Marketing Idea Perhaps?, FrozenSaab, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 19:24:42
  • Many of us know the story already...>, StanleyB, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:16:16
  • So much smoke, that it's coming out of your ears :), Jetplate, Wed, 4 Dec 2002 21:53:19
  • Re: Spoke with a salesman RE: 9-3AERO!!!, John Davies, Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:16:59
    • Here is Brian's take on this., Ian Glenday , Wed, 4 Dec 2002 21:12:35
      • Yes, and during the edmunds.com livechat, the SAAB guys, Jason 0W-40, Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:49:57
  • Re: Spoke with a salesman RE: 9-3AERO!!!, GM, Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:25:16
  • This would be better discussed on the 9-3 B/B since it, Ian Glenday , Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:36:30
    • Re: This would be better discussed on the 9-3 B/B since it, Rafe, Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:41:58
      • The 9-3 b/b is for both 9-3 and new 9-3SS, Ian Glenday , Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:50:12
        • Re: The 9-3 b/b is for both 9-3 and new 9-3SS, matt 94 aero, Wed, 4 Dec 2002 22:44:27
          • Thanks Matt, Ian Glenday , Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:15:09
  • Re: Spoke with a salesman RE: 9-3AERO!!!, Rafe, Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:33:45
    • You are probably very accurate. Last week Saab AB, Doc, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:01:42
      • If this is correct, AdamB , Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:57:15
        • The Epsilon platform can take all three..., b.flippo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:52:28
          • Not true. The Epsilon platform was designed from, Price, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:48:17
            • BTW, wasn't our last shot at a sport ute..., b.flippo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:16:02
              • Yes, the 266 Crossover was based on the Sigma, Price, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:30:33
                • Re: Yes, the 266 Crossover was based on the Sigma, officeboy, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:49:02
                  • Just think about, Price, Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:01:09
                    • BTW. What platform was the 9-X based on? n/m, b.flippo, Sat, 7 Dec 2002 11:59:26
                    • Sonnett based on WRX platform? n/m, Sieglo, Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:09:58
                  • Sorry, but I like my job. n/m, Price, Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:57:28
            • What!?! The CTS isn't Epsilon?, b.flippo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:13:49
              • No, the CTS is Sigma based. And I think the CTS is, Price, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:27:31
                • Terrible news, Sieglo, Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:03:22
                • Side by side...., b.flippo, Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:25:09
                  • I'm BLIND. I'm BLIND ... white walls on 9-5 ... Arrggh!, J, Sat, 7 Dec 2002 02:22:08
                  • I hope you're only joking...else I'm gonna throw up!!nm, Jason 0W-40, Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:59:32
                    • I don't have to agree with it..., b.flippo, Sat, 7 Dec 2002 10:05:17
                  • Caddy discourages Vogue stuff on CTS......, Mike Lynch , Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:50:02
                    • We are the largest Vogue market in America..., b.flippo, Sat, 7 Dec 2002 10:02:21
                      • SoCal, land of the import competition...., Mike Lynch , Sat, 7 Dec 2002 20:24:46
                        • The CTS was designed to compete in the Euro..., b.flippo, Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:18:33
                          • I agree..., Mike Lynch , Mon, 9 Dec 2002 20:03:01
                  • Sweet, Sieglo, Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:07:06
                    • How about chrome fender lips? n/m, b.flippo, Sat, 7 Dec 2002 11:13:53
                  • Isn't the CTS quite a bit longer than a 9-3SS?, Price, Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:50:38
                    • It's longer in regards to body..., b.flippo, Sat, 7 Dec 2002 10:00:15
                • IMO this is a major mistake on Saab's part..., AdamB , Thu, 5 Dec 2002 22:27:22
                  • Unfortunately, the larger brands that share the, Price, Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:56:31

No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.

• Prev by Date: I agree, bRAD, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:46:52
• Next by Date: Okay, I knew that I hadn't lost my mind..., b.flippo, Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:23:04
• Main General Bulletin Board

StateOfNine.com

SaabClub.com

Jak Stoll Performance

M Car Covers

Ad Available

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2024 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Mission & Privacy Notice.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]

Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)