1999-2009 [Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
![]() | [Main 95 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Bad sub-frame bushings??... Posted by MI-Roger [Email] ![]() ![]() In Reply to: Wow we are on such similar journeys..., Mark from Toronto, Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:41:56 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
Having owned two 9-5s, a 2000 lpt and now a 2008 Aero, I am a little surprised that both you and Bill are reporting poor ride quality. There was a short period of time wherein the redesigned sub-frame bushings installed at the factory were very short lived. I am thinking the bad design was for only the 2004 and 2005 model years, afterward the factory returned to a design identical (or very close) to the earlier bushings.
Perhaps worn/failed sub-frame bushings is what is causing your ride quality issues? I installed an Aero suspension in my 2000 after 200K miles and I liked that ride better than stock. Both my 9-5s were/are sedans and the wagons are reported as being more touchy in regards to suspension, particularly in the rear.
_______________________________________ Saabs owned: 2008 9-5 Aero Sedan, sold at 227K miles 2006 9-3SC 2.0T - Wife's daily driver 2000 Viggen Convertible - Sold May, 2022 1964 Quantum IV Formula Car - Retirement project 2000 9-5lpt Sedan, sold at 318K miles
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |